<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Java·Applied·Geodesy·3D - Measurement groups that contain values ​​out of tolerance</title>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/</link>
<description>Support forum for JAG3D software package</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Measurement groups that contain values ​​out of tolerance (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Amedeo,</p>
<p>the latest JAG3D version contains your suggested feature on group re-selection by data. Please finde this version here: <a href="https://github.com/applied-geodesy/jag3d/releases/latest">JAG3Dv20210606</a>.</p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Micha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5548</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5548</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2021 11:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Measurement groups that contain values ​​out of tolerance (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Amedeo,</p>
<blockquote><p>Simply perfect.</p>
</blockquote><p>Thank you for your reply and your positive feedback. I'll provide this feature within the next release.</p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Micha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5424</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5424</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 08:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Measurement groups that contain values ​​out of tolerance (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Micha,<br />
Simply perfect.<br />
I have tried in both the angle and distance groups and it works fine.<br />
This makes our work much easier.<br />
Thank you<br />
Amedeo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5423</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5423</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 07:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Amedeo</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Measurement groups that contain values ​​out of tolerance (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Amedeo,</p>
<blockquote><p>What do I do with it then?</p>
<p>Nothing particular, once I have the value out of tolerance and the corresponding campaign (group) I go to recheck the data I have loaded and check the anomalous angular values with respect to the history that I have available on other software and I make my decisions about it.</p>
</blockquote><p>Okay. So the next step is to identify the group(s) containing the observations and to make some kind of analysis. I have thought about this procedure and I've looked for a solution which is more <em>generic</em> and not restricted to a specific task e.g. outliers. I've added a new item &quot;<em>Select item groups</em>&quot; in the context menu of the table. The following screenshot depicts the new option. It is some kind of backward search and selection. It supports multi-selection of the table rows.</p>
<p><img src="https://i.ibb.co/vjbdsDh/jag3d-select-item-groups-tree-menu.png" alt="[image]"  /></p>
<p>I've uploaded a modified JAG3D version that contains this feature. Please take look at this version and let me know, how it works and if it is helpful during your analysis.</p>
<p>Download: <a href="https://dev.applied-geodesy.org/tmp/JAG3Dv20210522_Windows.zip">JAG3Dv20210522_Windows.zip</a></p>
<p>(I only upload the Windows version. Let me know, if you are working on Linux or MAC)</p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Micha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5407</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5407</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2021 08:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Measurement groups that contain values ​​out of tolerance (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply, Micha.</p>
<p>I know the procedures you showed me, but once you have identified the values that have not passed the tests, in a project that contains 4000 angular measurements divided into 100 campaigns (Groups), analyzing the stationing in which the anomalous value resides, is not difficult but rather slow, because you have to scroll one by one or in groups to find the stationing with values out of tolerance.</p>
<p>We have organized the work in Jag3d by measurement campaigns and therefore by groups, each campaign is named with a sequential number, the date, and obviously the station to be oriented.</p>
<p>What do I do with it then?</p>
<p>Nothing particular, once I have the value out of tolerance and the corresponding campaign (group) I go to recheck the data I have loaded and check the anomalous angular values with respect to the history that I have available on other software and I make my decisions about it.</p>
<p>I believe it is an implementation that would greatly facilitate the analysis and &quot;debugging&quot; of the uploaded data.</p>
<p>If you think it is appropriate I can send you a sample project.</p>
<p>Grazie.<br />
Amedeo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5405</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5405</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 19:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Amedeo</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
