<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Java·Applied·Geodesy·3D - Points importation</title>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/</link>
<description>Support forum for JAG3D software package</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>Points importation (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<blockquote><p>Okay but with coordinates approximate at few meters it should work right? </p>
</blockquote><p>It depends on several factors - the better the approximation values, the better the convergence behavior.</p>
<blockquote><p>And should I treat free stations like reference stations ?</p>
</blockquote><p>You are the only person who can answer this question. I am just the developer of a piece of software but I am not a member of your project. Please contact your supervisor.</p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Micha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=6016</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=6016</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Points importation (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Okay but with coordinates approximate at few meters it should work right? And should I treat free stations like reference stations ?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Omran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=6014</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=6014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Omran</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Points importation (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Omran,</p>
<blockquote><p>I tried to put them into the &quot;new points&quot; group without coordinates (0 0 0 instead) thinking that it won't influence calculation</p>
</blockquote><p>Least squares adjustment works only in linear models. Since planar or spatial networks are nonlinear problems, one has to <a href="https://software.applied-geodesy.org/wiki/least-squares-adjustment#linearisierung_der_beobachtungsgleichungen">linearize the functional model</a> using a first-order Taylor series. For that reason, appropriate approximation values must be specified by the user. In most cases, [0/0/0] is <em>not</em> a useful choice. </p>
<p>kind regards<br />
Micha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=6011</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=6011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>Points importation (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Ok I understand thank you.<br />
How can I indicate to Jag that some points are free stations? I tried to put them into the &quot;new points&quot; group without coordinates (0 0 0 instead) thinking that it won't influence calculation but it seems that I was wrong, so I approximate these coordinates and now it works but really badly. </p>
<p>Here is my project if you want to check : https://www.dropbox.com/s/jmain19nc1r6kzu/omran_2.zip?dl=0</p>
<p>Kind regards, <br />
Omran</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=6008</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=6008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Omran</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>GSI file with station (reply)</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<blockquote><p>I saw in the leica documentation that normally when you add a station in the tacheomter it add a line in the raw file called bloc code beginning with '41' but it seems that jag3d do not identify this code, do you know something about that? </p>
</blockquote><p>Code 41 does not represent/indicate a station. It is the code for the point type, e.g., a tree, a landmark, a traffic sign, a gully cover etc. So, code 41 is valid for all lines. (Btw: JAG3D reads the code.)</p>
<blockquote><p>I know that you can also indicate to jag3d that you add a station with a code '11' like you show me before but I still wanted to know if it is possible to add a bloc code.</p>
</blockquote><p>Code 11 does not indicate a station, too. It is the point id/name. Like for code 41, 11 is valid for all lines (and required).</p>
<p>In short: There is no specific bloc code in GSI that specify the station. However, bloc codes 81, 82, 83, and 84, 85, 86 have a semantic meaning.</p>
<p>/Micha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<link>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5961</link>
<guid>https://software.applied-geodesy.org/forum/index.php?id=5961</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Micha</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
